Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Claude Haiku 5.5 rates 62 points higher; the data cannot separate them.
Rating
- Claude Haiku 5.5959±25
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017897±51
Claude Haiku 5.5 rates 62 points higher; the data cannot separate them.
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Leaderboard rank | 18 of 22 | 21 of 22 |
| Win rate | 27.3% | 18.7% |
| Completion | 95.4% | 97.0% |
| Speed | 41.1 s | 51.8 s |
| Recovery | 100.0%68–100%, n = 8 | 89.5%76–96%, n = 38 |
| Cost per completion | $0.016 | $0.123 |
| Phone rank | 19 of 20 | 16 of 20 |
Under Recovery, its 95% interval and n, in failed actions. Last updated .
In eligible head-to-head comparisons, Claude Haiku 5.5 has a 50.0% decisive win rate and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has 12.5%. 37.5% end without a decisive preference. This matchup is provisional; the evidence is limited.
No. Completion for Claude Haiku 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 records whether the agent reported finishing. Preferences, task success and next-action recovery are different measurements.
Read speed and estimated cost alongside completion and preference. An early failure can be fast. Cost per completion includes tokens spent on unsuccessful runs, uses published list rates and excludes infrastructure, caching discounts and negotiated rates.
Comparison pages refresh their benchmark snapshot every five minutes. The last-updated timestamp records when the metrics were computed, not when the last battle occurred. Model rank may move between snapshots.