Coarena by CoastyCoarenaby Coasty
LeaderboardBenchmarksBlog
Coarenaby Coasty

Arena

  • Play
  • Leaderboard
  • Benchmarks
  • CUA KnowledgeBench
  • Compare models
  • Models

Evidence

  • Dataset
  • Methodology
  • CUA SafetyBench
  • Metrics API
  • Cite us

About

  • Mission
  • Governance
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Security
  • Subprocessors

Copyright © 2026 Coasty Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

oarenaoarena

Golden Benchmark

Fixed tasks with known answers, graded the same way for every model.

Full leaderboardJSON
Tasks
385
Models
26
Episodes
10,010

Standings

  1. 1–4Claude Opus 599.2±0.6
  2. 1–4Claude Fable 599.1±1.0
  3. 2–9Claude Fable 5.198.4±0.7
  4. 2–9Gemini 3.7 Flash97.9±1.7
  5. 2–12GPT-5.6 Sol97.9±1.8
  6. 3–12Claude Sonnet 597.6±1.2
  7. 3–12Gemini 3.8 Flash97.6±1.9
  8. 4–15GPT-6 Astra97.3±1.5
  9. 5–14GPT-5.6 Terra97.2±1.7
  10. 5–15Qwen3.8 Max97.0±1.2
  11. 5–16GPT-5.6 Luna96.8±1.8
  12. 7–16Muse Spark 1.296.7±1.1
  13. 6–16Kimi K396.4±1.5
  14. 9–16Gemini 3.5 Flash96.3±1.7
  15. 8–16GLM 5.3 Flash96.3±1.3
  16. 10–16Grok 4.696.2±1.8
  17. 16–18Claude Haiku 4.594.3±2.1
  18. 17–18Inkling93.8±2.3
889296100
Composite with its 95% interval; rank is the 95% band. 18 models, 385 tasks each, arena ratings as of September 6, 2026.

Not ranked

  1. Gemini 3.6 Flashretired97.7±1.7
  2. Muse Spark 1.33 games97.6±2.5
  3. GPT-5.5retired97.6±1.6
  4. GPT-5retired96.4±1.1
  5. Muse Glimmer 30Bretired95.1±1.9
  6. Kimi K2.7 Coderetired93.7±3.4
  7. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Literetired92.5±2.4
  8. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Literetired92.0±2.3
889296100
8 models, 95% intervals; under the 30-game arena floor or retired.
  1. Claude Opus 599.9
  2. Claude Fable 598.9
  3. Claude Fable 5.199.5
  4. Gemini 3.7 Flash97.5
  5. GPT-5.6 Sol97.5
  6. Claude Sonnet 597.7
  7. Gemini 3.8 Flash97.5
  8. GPT-6 Astra98.7
  9. GPT-5.6 Terra97.0
  10. Qwen3.8 Max97.0
  11. GPT-5.6 Luna96.3
  12. Muse Spark 1.298.5
  13. Kimi K395.7
  14. Gemini 3.5 Flash96.8
  15. GLM 5.3 Flash97.4
  16. Grok 4.696.9
  17. Claude Haiku 4.593.5
  18. Inkling92.9
859095100
Base with its 95% interval over tasks. 18 models, 385 tasks each, in Composite order.

Not ranked

  1. Gemini 3.6 Flashretired97.0
  2. Muse Spark 1.33 games97.6
  3. GPT-5.5retired97.4
  4. GPT-5retired97.9
  5. Muse Glimmer 30Bretired94.4
  6. Kimi K2.7 Coderetired93.7
  7. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Literetired90.6
  8. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Literetired89.8
859095100
8 models, 95% intervals; under the 30-game arena floor or retired.
  1. Claude Opus 51048±41
  2. Claude Fable 51079±35
  3. Claude Fable 5.11006±49
  4. Gemini 3.7 Flash1054±28
  5. GPT-5.6 Sol1051±25
  6. Claude Sonnet 51027±35
  7. Gemini 3.8 Flash1041±71
  8. GPT-6 Astra924±95
  9. GPT-5.6 Terra1025±36
  10. Qwen3.8 Max1007±34
  11. GPT-5.6 Luna1030±29
  12. Muse Spark 1.2918±44
  13. Kimi K31030±39
  14. Gemini 3.5 Flash967±35
  15. GLM 5.3 Flash931±52
  16. Grok 4.6961±34
  17. Claude Haiku 4.5968±42
  18. Inkling954±50
800900100011001200
Arena rating with its 95% interval as of September 6, 2026, 88 to 2,016 games per model, in Composite order.

Not ranked

  1. Gemini 3.6 Flashretired1061±30
  2. Muse Spark 1.33 gamesNot rated
  3. GPT-5.5retired1040±34
  4. GPT-5retired930±36
  5. Muse Glimmer 30Bretired974±95
  6. Kimi K2.7 CoderetiredNot rated
  7. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Literetired966±46
  8. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Literetired1024±33
800900100011001200
8 models, 95% intervals; 2 not rated, under the 30-game floor.
  1. Claude Opus 50.3%
  2. Claude Fable 52.1%
  3. Claude Fable 5.10.8%
  4. Gemini 3.7 Flash4.2%
  5. GPT-5.6 Sol3.6%
  6. Claude Sonnet 54.7%
  7. Gemini 3.8 Flash3.9%
  8. GPT-6 Astra1.6%
  9. GPT-5.6 Terra4.2%
  10. Qwen3.8 Max4.9%
  11. GPT-5.6 Luna5.5%
  12. Muse Spark 1.22.6%
  13. Kimi K37.0%
  14. Gemini 3.5 Flash6.0%
  15. GLM 5.3 Flash4.7%
  16. Grok 4.65.2%
  17. Claude Haiku 4.510.6%
  18. Inkling11.2%
0%5%10%15%20%25%
Share of episodes scoring below 1.0, with its Wilson 95% interval. 18 models, 385 episodes each, in Composite order.

Not ranked

  1. Gemini 3.6 Flashretired5.2%
  2. Muse Spark 1.33 games3.4%
  3. GPT-5.5retired3.9%
  4. GPT-5retired4.2%
  5. Muse Glimmer 30Bretired9.1%
  6. Kimi K2.7 Coderetired10.1%
  7. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Literetired15.1%
  8. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Literetired17.1%
0%5%10%15%20%25%
8 models, 95% intervals; under the 30-game arena floor or retired.

Points lost by tier

CoreHardDiverseEdge
Claude Opus 50.00.00.00.6
Claude Fable 50.02.10.03.1
Claude Fable 5.10.00.61.70.0
Gemini 3.7 Flash0.38.50.03.1
GPT-5.6 Sol0.010.30.01.9
Claude Sonnet 50.83.73.03.1
Gemini 3.8 Flash0.08.50.03.6
GPT-6 Astra0.06.40.00.0
GPT-5.6 Terra0.611.40.01.9
Qwen3.8 Max1.17.22.52.5
GPT-5.6 Luna1.112.80.03.1
Muse Spark 1.20.25.81.10.0
Kimi K30.08.68.04.2
Gemini 3.5 Flash0.011.40.23.6
GLM 5.3 Flash1.04.92.03.6
Grok 4.60.011.10.03.9
Claude Haiku 4.50.616.49.04.7
Inkling1.714.712.83.8
Points below 100 within each tier, 18 ranked models; darker is more lost. No interval is published per tier.

Stability

Daily movement

  1. Arena alone0.287
  2. Composite at k = 10.111
  3. Composite0.082
00.10.20.3
Mean absolute change per model per day, in Base points. 14 models over the last 30 days of the arena snapshot; no interval is published.

Rank agreement

  1. Arena alone0.883
  2. Composite at k = 10.951
  3. Composite0.958
00.51
Mean Kendall τ between consecutive days’ rankings. 14 models over the last 30 days of the arena snapshot; no interval is published.

Leader changes

  1. Arena alone7%
  2. Composite at k = 127%
  3. Composite7%
0%50%100%
Share of days the top model changed. 14 models over the last 30 days of the arena snapshot; no interval is published.

Reliability

Split halves

  1. All templates0.85
  2. Coreuninformative0.48
  3. Hard0.85
  4. Diverse0.86
  5. Edge0.57
00.250.50.751
Spearman ρ of Base between seed halves, 26 models, mean of 10 splits, with Fisher-z 95% intervals.

Second pass

  1. Claude Opus 51 of 220−0.27
  2. Claude Fable 54 of 220+0.05
  3. Claude Fable 5.13 of 220+0.32
  4. Gemini 3.7 Flash0 of 3850.00
  5. GPT-5.6 Sol5 of 385+0.07
  6. Claude Sonnet 57 of 385−0.11
  7. Qwen3.8 Max16 of 385+0.38
−0.50+0.5
Base, second pass minus first, 7 models; beside each name, the episodes that flipped. Per-run SE 0.16 points; no interval per model is published.
How it’s measured
Tasks
77 templates with 5 seeds each, deterministic and journal-graded against a known correct outcome. Every model runs the same tasks, seeds and grader version; 7 ran a second pass. 29 templates are at ceiling.
Base
100 × the mean over templates of each template’s mean over its seeds, so every template counts once. Its interval is a 95% bootstrap over templates: how Base would move if the task set were resampled.
Composite
Composite = clamp(Base + W_MAX·σB·clamp(k·z_arena − z_base, ±3), 0, 100); k = σL²/(σL² + SE_L²); w = W_MAX once the arena rating is Bradley-Terry (≥ 30 games), else 0 (listed, unranked)Base and the arena are standardised as z-scores in the calibration cohort. A declared 60/40 blend of two constructs (r = 0.433 between Base and the arena logit in the cohort), not an estimate of one quantity. The interval is the published 95% interval, clipped to [0, 100].
Shrinkage
k shrinks a young arena rating toward the cohort mean by its precision: GPT-6 Astra’s ±95 counts at k = 0.49, GPT-5.6 Sol’s ±25 at 0.93.
Rank
The 95% interval of the model’s rank under a joint bootstrap: templates resampled in step across models, each arena rating jittered by its standard error. Where the data cannot separate two models, the band says so.
Cohort
14 models: roster ∩ coverage = 1.0 ∩ Bradley-Terry ∩ games ≥ 300. Frozen constants: W_MAX 0.4, μB 96.857, σB 1.891, μL 0.049, σL 0.271, balance point W 0.435.
Stabilised rating
stable = 1000 + 173.72·(μL + σL·z_C), z_C = z_base + W_MAX·clamp(k·z_arena − z_base, ±3); w = 0 below the arena floor (Base-only)The Composite’s z on the arena’s Elo scale, in the Composite’s order. It is published as a second opinion: the leaderboard ranks on the live arena fit alone, and this benchmark carries no weight there.
Stability
Base is fixed, so the Composite moves only with the arena, at W_MAX × k of the arena’s own daily movement. Composite at k = 1 ignores shrinkage; Composite uses each day’s k.
Reliability
Split halves compare the seeds 2 against 3, in all 10 ways. A tier whose cross-model sd is under 1 Base point is uninformative. The Spearman-Brown full-length estimate over all templates is 0.921. A flip is an episode whose pass or fail changed on the second pass.
Release
gb-1.3.0/env-1.1.0/grader-1.3.0, generated September 7, 2026, calibrated by scripts/bench/calibration/gb-1.3.0_env-1.1.0_grader-1.3.0.json.
PairGapFlips at W_MAX
Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 50.1140.454
Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Fable 5.10.6540.192
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash0.5170.537
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol0.046not reported
GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 50.2500.174

Top-pair order sensitivity: the Composite gap and the W_MAX at which the pair would change order.

ModelStabilisedkGamesSolvedSevere
Claude Opus 51067 ±140.841,47676/770.0%
Claude Fable 51064 ±240.871,58574/770.0%
Claude Fable 5.11048 ±170.7818674/770.0%
Gemini 3.7 Flash1035 ±430.921,11073/771.3%
GPT-5.6 Sol1034 ±440.932,01673/772.3%
Claude Sonnet 51027 ±300.8795869/770.3%
Gemini 3.8 Flash1026 ±460.6320574/771.6%
GPT-6 Astra1019 ±380.498875/771.6%
GPT-5.6 Terra1017 ±430.871,10771/772.6%
Qwen3.8 Max1011 ±310.8848167/770.5%
GPT-5.6 Luna1008 ±440.9189868/772.3%
Muse Spark 1.21003 ±270.8236370/770.5%
Kimi K3998 ±370.8555362/771.8%
Gemini 3.5 Flash994 ±420.8771069/770.8%
GLM 5.3 Flash994 ±310.7618267/770.3%
Grok 4.6992 ±450.8847271/771.3%
Claude Haiku 4.5945 ±510.8376858/772.6%
Inkling932 ±570.7747556/774.9%

Per ranked model: the stabilised rating with its published ±, k, arena games as of September 6, 2026, templates solved, and the severe rate (episodes at or below 0.25).

Full methodology